![]() ![]() In some cases, WebP can be a faster-loading option than PNGs of the same quality for lossless and transparent graphics, logos, and icons. This is especially true for simpler images with large blocks or swatches of similar color and contrast (See our Graphic: JPG vs WebP test below).Īn ideal scenario for WebPs replacing JPG would be when featuring a group of smaller pictures on a page-like product photos, location photos, or other non-hero images. WebP lossy compressed images can replace JPG photos with better-optimized file sizes because of their newer lossy compression process. Unlike JPGs, which were originally created to compress files on digital cameras, WebPs were designed specifically to compress graphics on the web.Īs Hurrdat Marketing’s Creative Director, Max Riffner, says, “Anything that’s built natively for the web is going to be better.” According to Riffner: “It’s just a matter of time now before becomes the default, especially for photography on the web.” Compresses Photos & Screenshots When and why should you use WebP’s unique features and speed benefits? Here are a couple of reasons and best-use cases for WebP to consider. PNGs are the most recognizable lossless file type. No image data is lost during compression (except for unnecessary camera metadata ). **Lossless image compression minimally shrinks file size while maintaining original image quality. JPGs are the most recognizable lossy file type. An algorithm permanently removes data from the image during compression, worsening the image’s clarity and details. *Lossy image compression significantly shrinks file sizes by decreasing image quality. WebP image files support features including: It combined the best features of the three most popular image types-JPG, PNG, and GIF-into one size-optimized file. Google developed the WebP file format to be the internet’s fastest-loading image type in 2010. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |